The NIWRC filed an amicus brief in support of the United States as part of its VAWA Sovereignty Initiative, arguing that if the Ninth Circuits decision was allowed to stand, it would significantly impair the ability of Tribal law enforcement to address domestic violence crimes perpetrated by non-Indians in Tribal communities, and ultimately if left unturned, the Ninth Circuits decision would only exacerbate the crisis of Murdered and Missing Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG). ), Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. The other officers, including an officer with the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, then arrived. 3006A (b) and (c), We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. See Brief for Cayuga Nation etal. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. See Brief amicus curiae of Indian Law Scholars and Professors filed. Id., at 1142. Saylors search and detention, however, do not subsequently subject Cooley to tribal law, but rather only to state and federal laws that apply whether an individual is outside a reservation or on a state or federal highway within it. Through Savannas Act and the Not Invisible Act, both signed into law in 2019, Congress reaffirmed its commitment to empowering Tribes to better protect their communities on Tribal lands and throughout Indian country jurisdiction. The conclusion that Saylors actions here fall within Montanas second exception is consistent with the Courts prior Montana cases. [emailprotected]. In support of this motion, espondent R supplies the following information: 1. Not the right Joshua? (Distributed), Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020. We set forth two important exceptions. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. Feigin said the tribes authority to detain comes from the inherent sovereign authority that Indian tribes had before they were incorporated into the United States and which they never lost. The government attorney added that this authority is not granted by the Constitution or Congress but that it is recognized by both of those sources and admitted that were not looking at some specific provision.. See more results for Joshua Cooley. v. Joshua James Cooley (Petitioner) (Respondent) Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. See, e.g., Brief for Former United States Attorneys as Amici Curiae 24 (noting that 3.5 million of the 4.6 million people living in American Indian areas in the 2010 census were non-Indians); Brief for National Indigenous Womens Resource Center etal. (Distributed). Joshua James Cooley, Joshua J Cooley. Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. 572 U.S. 782, 788 (2014). Argued. Joshua James Cooley lives at Eugene, OR, in zip codes 97408, 97405, 97402, 97403, 97401, and 97322 currently and he/she is 42 years old now. Because many reservations are home to a predominantly non-Indian population, including many of the 26 VAWA-implementing Tribal Nations, the Ninth Circuits unworkable standard for Tribal law enforcement in effectuating stops of non-Indians suspected of committing a crime on reservations threatened to jeopardize Native womens safety further. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Those standards require tribal officers first to determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, allow temporary detention only if the violation of law is apparent. 919 F.3d, at 1142. filed. After the officer asked the driver to roll down his window, the driver did so, opening the window a few inches. 450 U.S. 544 (1981), is highly relevant. See, e.g., Plains Commerce Bank, 554 U.S., at 328330; Nevada v. Hicks, At the same time, we made clear that Montanas general proposition was not an absolute rule. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020. In short, we see nothing in these provisions that shows that Congress sought to deny tribes the authority at issue, authority that rests upon a tribes retention of sovereignty as interpreted by Montana, and in particular its second exception. (Distributed). The NIWRC argued that ultimately the Ninth Circuits decision would impede the policy goals Congress has issued in combating violence against Native women, and Native women and girls would suffer as a result. For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric R. Henkel, Missoula, Mont. The Cheyenne people and cultural lifeways are beautiful and thriving here. And they are also underinclusive. (Distributed). The NIWRC main office resides on the ancestral lands of the Tstshsthese andSo'taeo'o (Cheyenne) People. brother. brother. filed. Such threats may be posed by, for instance, non-Indian drunk drivers, transporters of contraband, or other criminal offenders operating on roads within the boundaries of a tribal reservation. The District Court granted Cooleys motion to suppress the drug evidence that Saylor had seized. 3006A(d)(7), Respondent Joshua James Cooley requests leave to file the accompanying Brief in Opposition without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis. Have a tip or story idea? Late at night in February 2016, Officer James Saylor of the Crow Police Department was driving east on United States Highway 212, a public right-of-way within the Crow Reservation, located within the State of Montana. Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. (Distributed). Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. In doing so we have reserved a tribes inherent sovereign authority to engage in policing of the kind before us. The time to file the appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 8, 2021. When the jurisdiction to try and punish an offender rests outside the tribe, tribal officers may exercise their power to detain the offender and transport him to the proper authorities; the authority to search that individual before transport is ancillary to that authority. Throughout the Petition, the government repeatedly conflates the power to detain and transport with the power to detain, investigate, and generally police. The location was federal Highway 212 which crosses the Crow Indian Reservation. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Brief amici curiae of Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al. LOW HIGH. Martha Patsey Stewart. Finally, the Court doubts the workability of the Ninth Circuits standards, which would require tribal officers first to determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, to temporarily detain a non-Indian only for apparent legal violations. 0 Rate Joshua. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress filed. In the wee hours of February 26, 2016, a police officer saw a pickup truck with out-of-state plates idling on the side on a remote stretch of highway. StrongHearts Native Helpline 0 Reputation Score Range. Because Saylor had not initially tried to determine whether Cooley was an Indian, the panel held that the lower court correctly suppressed the evidence. . Brief for United States 2425. Similarly, we recognized in Duro that [w]here jurisdiction to try and punish an offender rests outside the tribe, tribal officers may exercise their power to detain the offender and transport him to the proper authorities. 495 U.S., at 697. James Cooley. CONTACT US. Saylor made no additional attempt to find out whether Cooley was an Indian or not. Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. 533 U.S. 353, 358360, and n.3 (2001); South Dakota v. Bourland, The officer then unholstered his service pistol and asked the driver for identification later claiming to have seen two semiautomatic rifles on the front passenger seat. In response, Cooley cautions against inappropriately expand[ing] the second Montana exception. Brief for Respondent 2425 (citing Atkinson, 532 U.S., at 657, n.12, and Strate, 520 U.S., at 457458). Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. (Distributed). Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. 9th Circuit. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion. Reply of petitioner United States filed. The District Court granted Cooleys motion to suppress the drug evidence. Justice Stephen Breyer gave little away during his questioning of the government attorney but appeared skeptical of Henkels position. Breyer, J., delivered the. to Pet. The Ninth Circuits two-step process would begin with an initial determination as to whether or not the stopped individual was an Indian, and if the individual was non-Indian, the Tribal police would have to release the suspect unless it was obvious or apparent that federal or state law was violated. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. (Corrected brief submitted - March 22, 2021), Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., In all cases, tribal authority remains subject to the plenary authority of Congress. Henkel eventually said the first question to answer in each scenario should be whether or not the would-be detained person is subject to tribal authority. Instead, [the Supreme Court] at most recognized a narrow circumstance in which a tribal officer possesses a limited authority to detain non-Indian offenders and transport them to the custody of state or federal authorities. The Supreme Court expressed doubts about the workability of the Ninth Circuits ruling, noting that requiring Tribal police to ask suspects a threshold question regarding whether they were Indian would produce an incentive to lie. Further, the Court found the apparent violation standard would introduce a wholly new standard into search and seizure law with no guidance as to how the standard would be met. It reasoned that a tribal police officer could stop (and hold for a reasonable time) a non-Indian suspect if the officer first tries to determine whether the suspect is non-Indian and, in the course of doing so, finds an apparent violation of state or federal law. as Amici Curiae 78, 2527. (Appointed by this Court. Photos. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. Argued. Several Ninth Circuit judges issued a dissenting opinion to this decision, stating that the panels extraordinary decision in this case directly contravenes long-established Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court precedent, disregards contrary authority from other state and federal appellate courts and threatens to seriously undermine the ability of Indian Tribes to ensure public safety for the hundreds of thousands of persons who live on reservations within the Ninth Circuit.. Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. WATCH LIVE: Ex-boyfriend on trial for allegedly killing womans new beau, WATCH LIVE: Psychic on Trial in Spousal Swindling Case, WATCH LIVE: XXXTentacion murder trial 3 men charged in 2018 shooting death of rapper, Law&Crime Looks Ahead to 10 Remarkable Criminal Trials Scheduled for the First Half of 2023, 9 Shocking Times Defendants Testified at Trial, Judge throws the book at boyfriend for killing and dismembering girlfriend, whose remains were scattered outside their home, Coward rapper: Florida gang member shoots rival in the back, then raps about it on social media: Sheriff, A bald Alex Murdaugh appears in booking mugshot after hes sentenced to two life terms for killing wife and son, Im a father and I couldnt do this: Florida man convicted of murdering almost 3-month-old baby boy, Jan. 6th rioter who stole Officer Michael Fanones badge following Capitol assault pleads guilty, 'Coward rapper': Florida gang member shoots rival in the back, then raps about it on social media: Sheriff, A bald Alex Murdaugh appears in booking mugshot after he's sentenced to two life terms for killing wife and son, 'I'm a father and I couldn't do this': Florida man convicted of murdering almost 3-month-old baby boy, Jan. 6th rioter who stole Officer Michael Fanone's badge following Capitol assault pleads guilty, Former reality TV star gets life sentence for murder-for-hire plot targeting nephew, New Jersey appears to be edging out its New York neighbor in SCOTUS battle over regulation of waterfront, Justices focus on two ways to duck deciding the legality of Bidens student loan forgiveness plan during oral arguments in major cases, Justices Gorsuch and Barrett face off as strange SCOTUS lineup backs millionaire with hundreds of foreign bank accounts, Justice Ketanji Brown Jacksons first opinion on the Supreme Court decides who gets to keep millions in unclaimed funds, SCOTUS takes up major case that could end Obama-era federal agency created after 2008 financial crisis, Justice Sotomayor pens majority SCOTUS opinion saying Arizona cant ignore federal law as Justice Barrett fiercely dissents. While the driver talked, he allegedly began pulling wads of cash from his pockets, which the officer says alarmed him. . Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Cooley that a Crow Tribal police officer had the authority to search and detain a non-Indian, Joshua James Cooley, suspected of committing a crime on a highway crossing through the Crow Reservation. Oct 15 2020. Brief amici curiae of Crow Tribe of Indians, National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. And we hold the tribal officer possesses the authority at issue. The Ninth Circuit affirmed. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. The officer looked inside and claimed that he saw the driver had bloodshot, watery eyes and that a little boy was climbing on his lap. The case involves roadside assistance, drug crimes, and the Crow people. filed. Elijah Cooley. 18 U.S.C. 3731. But we have also repeatedly acknowledged the existence of the exceptions and preserved the possibility that certain forms of nonmember behavior may sufficiently affect the tribe as to justify tribal oversight. Id., at 335. Cooley was charged with crimes in federal court, and moved to suppress the evidence as the fruit of an illegal search. The first requirement produces an incentive to lie. Ultimately, after two separate searches of the vehicle, the officer found a pistol next to the drivers hand, along with methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Respond ent Joshua James Cooley respectfully re-quests that this ourt affirmC the judgment of the United States Cour t of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 19-1414, on March 23, 2021. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. The Ninth Circuit concluded that Saylor had failed to make that initial determination here. The NIWRC pointed out that with this authority, Congress is currently taking action to affirmnot restrictTribal authority. View Joshua Kenneth Cooley results including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. Second, we said that a tribe may also retain inherent power to exercise civil authority over the conduct of non-Indians on fee lands within its reservation when that conduct threatens or has some direct effect on the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the tribe. Id., at 566 (emphasis added). While that authority has sometimes been traced to a tribes right to exclude non-Indians, tribes have inherent sovereignty independent of th[e] authority arising from their power to exclude, Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation, Breyer, J., delivered the, Heidepriem, Purtell, Siegel & Hinrichs, LLP, Party name: Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona, Party name: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Party name: The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders, Party name: Citizens Equal Rights Foundation, Party name: Former United States Attorneys, Party name: National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP, Party name: Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Party name: Indian Law Scholars and Professors, Party name: National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations, Party name: Current and Former Members of Congress. View Joshua Cooley results in California (CA) including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. Even though Congress recognized in VAWA 2013 that the Tribal police of a VAWA-implementing Tribe have full authority to arrest non-Indians who commit domestic violence crimes on a reservation, the Ninth Circuit standard in Cooley would leave an open-ended question as to whether Tribal police would have to ascertain the suspects Indian status before effectuating a Terry stop, even if they had reasonable suspicion that the suspect committed a crime of domestic violence. See, e.g., Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co., These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. 9th Circuit. United States of America . In that case we asked whether a tribe could regulate hunting and fishing by non-Indians on land that non-Indians owned in fee simple on a reservation. . (Distributed), Amicus brief of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation not accepted for filing. Saylor saw a truck parked on the westbound side of the highway. Amicus brief of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation not accepted for filing. It reasoned that Saylor, as a Crow Tribe police officer, lacked the authority to investigate nonapparent violations of state or federal law by a non-Indian on a public right-of-way crossing the reservation. Response Requested. The Ninth Circuit denied the Governments request for rehearing en banc. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley in opposition filed. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. 450 U.S. 544, 566 (1981); see also Strate v. A1 Contractors, When pressing Henkel, Justice Kavanaugh seemed interested in crafting a limited remedy in order to do no harm so the court might issue a narrow result and not create broad ripple effects. Henkel rejected this offer, saying the cases cited by Kavanaugh were dicta that have been misrepresented by the government. Affirmation of inherent tribal power to police blurs civil and criminal Indian law tests, Court unanimously holds that Indian tribes retain the inherent power to police non-Indians, Court struggles with the indefensible morass its made in Indian law, Tribal police drag messy Indian sovereignty cases back to the court, Justices announce low-key March argument session, Court shelves oral argument in dispute over Mueller materials, grants two new cases, Petitions of the week: Political donations, gun rights, the emoluments clause and more, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service. (Due October 15, 2020). However, VAWA 2013 directly contradicts this assertion because in VAWA 2013, Congress unmistakably acted to close jurisdictional loopholes by restoring the ability of Tribal Nations to exercise criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians for crimes of domestic violence, dating violence, and criminal violations of protective orders. The brief argued that not only was the probable-cause-plus standard impractical, but the legal reasoning behind the Ninth Circuits decision was flawed. See 495 U.S., at 696697. Reply of petitioner United States filed. On June 1, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a decision overturning the Ninth Circuits decision, and ultimately, upholding the inherent authority of Tribal Nations to stop and detain individuals on a reservation when reasonable suspicion arises that they have committed a crimeregardless of whether they are Indian. Believing the occupants might need assistance, Saylor approached the truck and spoke to the driver, Joshua James Cooley. Similarly, the Court has held that when the jurisdiction to try and punish an offender rests outside the tribe, tribal officers may exercise their power to detain the offender and transport him to the proper authorities. Duro v. Reina, We reiterated this point in Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley, Justices heard about a police officer stop on the Crow Reservation in Montana, where a non-Indian was found with drugs and was charged with . Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2020 to August 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The Court of Appeals denied this petition as well. Careers Contact NIWRC Oct 15 2020. Joshua Cooley January 24, 2020 in Uncategorized tagged BIA Cases by biahelp FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. Join Mailing List For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric R. Henkel, Missoula, Mont. NOTICE:This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Brief amici curiae of Crow Tribe of Indians, National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. We turn to precedent to determine whether a tribe has retained inherent sovereign authority to exercise that power. SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. . 508 U.S. 679, 694696 (1993); Duro v. Reina, Ancillary to the authority to transport a non-Indian suspect is the authority to search that individual prior to transport, as several state courts and other federal courts have held. filed. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. Speakers Bureau 510 U.S. 931 (1993). 495 U.S. 676, 697. The liberal justice pushed Henkel to account for what he thought tribal officers do have the authority to do by throwing out a series of What If situations. (Due October 15, 2020). Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. These cookies do not store any personal information. SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. View Joshua Cooley results in Colorado (CO) including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. Crow Police Officer Saylor approached a truck parked on U.S. Highway 212, a public right-of-way within the Crow Reservation in Montana. The authority to search a non-Indian prior to transport is ancillary to this authority that we have already recognized. The United States filed a petition to have the Ninth Circuit panels probable-cause-plus opinion reheard en banc (before the full circuit court as opposed to a three-judge panel). 39. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States. Brief amicus curiae of Indian Law Scholars and Professors filed. Because Saylor was not clear on Cooleys alleged lawbreaking until after the truck was searched, Saylors seizure had been unauthorized and the evidence from the two unlawful searches conducted by the tribal officer was suppressed. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. Waiver of right of respondent Joshua James Cooley to respond filed. View Actual Score Check Background This is me - Control Profile Are you Joshua Cooley? 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Courts evidence- suppression determination. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. The brief was the NIWRCs eighth amicus brief filed pursuant to the VAWA Sovereignty Initiative, aimed at educating federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court, on the connection between sovereignty and safety for Native women and protecting the Violence Against Women Acts restoration of Tribal sovereign authority to prosecute non-Indian offenders. 919 F.3d 1135, 1142. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. Holding: A tribal police officer has authority to detain temporarily and to search a non-Native American traveling on a public right-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law. Saylor was directed to seize all contraband in plain view, leading Saylor to discover more methamphetamine. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. It was Feb. 26, 2016 on Highway 212, where Indian Highway Safety Officer James Saylor arrested Joshua Cooley after finding several guns and 356 grams of methamphetamine inside his vehicle. (Distributed), Amicus brief of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation not accepted for filing. The 9th Circuit decision is now being reviewed by the Supreme Court. . Joshua Cooley later sought to have the evidence against him suppressed. Joshua James Cooley was parked in his pickup truck on the side of a road within the Crow Reservation in Montana when Officer James Saylor of the Crow Tribe approached his truck in the early hours of the morning. Cf. ABOUT Late one night Officer James Saylor of the Crow Police Department approached a truck parked on United States Highway 212, a public right-of-way within the Crow Reservation in the State of Montana. There is, however, an Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA) analogue to the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by an Indian tribe. Saylor confiscated several firearms and observed equipment that appeared to contain methamphetamine. Box 445 Billings, MT 59103-0445 Telephone: (406) 294-2424 Facsimile: (406) 294-5586 Email: ashley@haradalawfirm.com Attorney for Joshua James Cooley His age is 40. joshua james cooley: Birthdate: 1830: Death: 1914 (83-84) Immediate Family: Son of henry cooley and susannah rebecca cooley Husband of maria cooley Father of john cooley. Joshua James Cooley, Joshua J Cooley. See 2803(3). Tribal police officers have authority to detain temporarily and to search non-Indian persons traveling on public rights-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law; they are not required to first determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, to temporarily detain a non-Indian only for apparent legal violations. Response Requested. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020. Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. Jesse Cooley. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States. More broadly, cross-deputization agreements are difficult to reach, and they often require negotiation between other authorities and the tribes over such matters as training, reciprocal authority to arrest, the geographical reach of the agreements, the jurisdiction of the parties, liability of officers performing under the agreements, and sovereign immunity. Fletcher, Fort, & Singel, Indian Country Law Enforcement and Cooperative Public Safety Agreements, 89 Mich. BarJ. 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1); Monthly rental prices for a two-bedroom unit in the zip code 80229 is around $1,510. Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. Instead, Justice Breyers opinion went further, and re-affirmed the constitutional authority of Congress to restore the Tribal jurisdiction that Oliphant previously erased, once again concluding that [i]n all cases, tribal authority remains subject to the plenary authority of Congress. At a time when NIWRC and so many others are working hard to get a bipartisan VAWA through the Senate, it is highly significant that the Supreme Court, once again, has confirmed Congresss constitutional authority to restore Tribal jurisdiction over non-Indian defendants. Here, no treaty or statute has explicitly divested Indian tribes of the policing authority at issue.